UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ELLEN MARIANI, Individually, as Personal Representative of the Estate of LOUIS NEIL MARIANI, deceased, and others similarly situated
Plaintiff vs. ) Case No. 03-5273
GEORGE W. BUSH, President of ) Judge Eduardo C. Robreno the United States, Officially and Individually,
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
and
RICHARD CHENEY, Vice President of The United States, Officially and Individually
and
JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General of the United States (DOJ), Officially and Individually
and
DONALD H. RUMSFELD, Secretary of Defense (DOD), Officially and Individually
and
GEORGE J. TENET, Director, Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), Officially and Individually
and
NORMAN Y. MINETA, Secretary, Department of Transportation (DOT), Officially and Individually
and
PETER G. PETERSON, Chairman of the Board, COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS (CFR), Officially and Individually
and
CONDOLEEZZA RICE, National Security Advisor, to Defendant Bush, Officially and Individually
and
GEORGE H. BUSH, Former, Director, Central Intelligence Agency, (CIA), Vice-President and President of
the United States of America, Officially and Individually
and
KENNETH R. FEINBERG, Special Master, “September 11 Victim Compensation Fund of 2001” Officially and Individually
and
Other unnamed past, present, officials, representatives, agents, and private consultants of THE UNITED STATES )
OF AMERICA
Defendants.5
PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED COMPLAINT6
NOW COMES the Plaintiff, Ellen Mariani, on information, belief and established facts, by and through her counsel of record, Philip J. Berg, Esquire, and for her causes of action against all named and unnamed Defendants states the following:
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
1. Plaintiff commenced this civil action on September 12, 2003, by filing of Complaint with this Honorable Court. Since Plaintiff’s initial filing and the ‘firestorm” surrounding Defendant George W. Bush’s refusal to comply with the “911 Commission,” this Amended Complaint provides newly discovered substantial additional facts, evidence and voluntary support from former federal employees and other concerned American Citizens who all seek justice and the truth as to how and why the events of September 11, 2001, (hereinafter “911”), occurred. Plaintiff hereby asserts Defendants, officially and individually are exclusively liable to answer the Counts in this Complaint under the United States Constitution and provisions of the 18 U.S.C. § 1964(a) and (c), Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (hereinafter “RICO Act”) for “failing to act and prevent” the murder of Plaintiff’s husband, Louis Neil Mariani, for financial and political reasons and have “obstructed justice” in the aftermath of said criminal acts and omissions.
The the whole suit Here
Americans! Know Your Rights! You Have None!
by Harry Lime
Know your rights when the government accuses you of being a terrorist.
The Washington Post of June 5, 2004, carried an article (page A03) by Michael Powell entitled
“Padilla Case Puts Lawyers in Limbo, Too”: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A16691-2004Jun4.html
This article concerns Jose Padilla, who was arrested in May 2002 at Chicago’s O’Hare International Airport. A few weeks later, President Bush designated Padilla an enemy combatant and ordered him held indefinitely “without charges or access to a lawyer” at a naval brig in Charleston, S.C. This spring the Pentagon finally allowed [Padilla's lawyer Donna R.] Newman to meet again with Padilla, but only if two government officials monitored and videotaped their conversation.
This means that you no longer have the right to speak alone with an attorney.
Several prominent legal critics of the administration agree that there is a legal precedent for holding U.S. citizens as prisoners in wartime … [but] they said the executive branch must concede a brake on its powers…. Other legal scholars take a more sympathetic view of the administration’s task, arguing that it is too early to give Padilla unfettered access to the American legal system.
This means that you no longer have the legal rights of citizens if the government says you don’t.
Deputy Attorney General James B. Comey Jr. … insisted that it could prove difficult to convict Padilla in a civilian court. … This raises the possibility that Padilla might find himself in a legal Catch-22, too difficult to prosecute and too dangerous to release.
This means that the government can now lock you up indefinitely regardless of what any court of law, even the Supreme Court, says. In effect, the Executive Branch of our government has quietly eliminated the Judicial Branch.
The American political system of checks and balances has now ceased to exist “it disappeared while average Americans were watching mindless drivel on TV, driving their SUVs and gobbling their hamburgers” and now we have a de facto tyranny. You get the government you deserve. Unfortunately for your children (and their children) they get it too.