Love, Plasma and the Butterfly Effect

Why do I write about creation and plasma on a blog titled addiction help?  Unlike many out there I go on the theory that a treatment should result in a cure.  If treatment isn’t a remedy – what is it?  Should it even be called a treatment?  People who practice addictions, which is the vast majority of the western pop/money culture, once treated will practice different behavior.  At that moment we start to move in the direction of life and creation.  Either that or slip back into destruction.

So the focus of the website is to move all people into intentional creation.  In order to assist in this venture I write for the people willing to move.  With that in mind I’ll get to it.

As a result of intuitive dreaming  (it’s here just use the search)  I’ve been able to get some ideas about what’s going on at the structural level of the universe.  I’ve had a problem fitting the whole – creation as a movement between formed and unformed – because I couldn’t get a picture of it in my mind. I’ve recently been looking at love as vibration.  Although I think there’s something to it – it’s almost impossible to nail down.  There are so many opinions – all saying that “This or That” is the way to change our vibrational state from fear to love.  But I find they all come short of telling exactly what to do or what it is as a, concrete hands on, goal.

No where else in the world do I find this problem of elusiveness. At least not anywhere I’d pay attention. Most of the stuff that rattles around in the minds of societies pundits is just so far off I simply ignore it.  Economics, main stream cosmology and the evolutionists, the social planners etc. haven’t got any solid evidence and are simply allowed  to speculate at the cost of the global mind.  But, Love as a vibrational cause has a foundation of scientific discovery.  Scientists like the Buddhists and Vedas have done extensive experimentation into vibratory states.  Cymantics demonstrates the effect of sound (vibration ) on matter.  What we have been led to believe is that the world is made mostly of space – and out of that space ( the void ) creation takes shape.  Only, in this field of conscious creation does something emerge out of nothing.  We say that this nothing is energy.  Cosmologists say it’s dark matter or dark energy.  They’ve never detected any – they just say it.  It fills the holes in their science.

“Einstein, in looking at a macroscopic perspective of the Universe, said in his Theory of Relativity that there are more than three dimensions. Human beings can only visualize in three dimensions. We can only see three dimensions so we have assumed that that is all there is.”

The other day I got as far as – the void being unformed creative energy  potential.  Again, not very satisfying and not universally helpful.  While some might be able to work with it, to some degree, most can’t.  It still wreaks of the Mystical.

OK, so we can’t see it with our eyes.  What about a device?  We can detect far more vibrational energy with our devices than with our senses – where is it?  Where and what is this medium I am supposed to effect?  The best theories have all been proven.  They are now known as laws.  Gravity is not a theory.  You can test it yourself.  The description of the origin of gravity is debatable.  If it was known we could make it.  When we can make it then our world will change in ways we have only dreamed of.  The rest of the theories about the “4th dimension” are just theories.  You can’t operate well on theory,  you can only test them.

The law of attraction, while I am convinced is a law, is a law that has a similarity to the law of gravity in that – while we know it’s there we don’t know why.  This, not knowing why, leads to a myriad of speculation.  Speculation is good – as long as we don’t confuse it with knowing.  I have a really tough time going along with things until I know something about them.  I can’t do a good job of making something without a clear picture of what it is, and how it fits together.  I struggle with this all the time in building the website.  I can’t see the whole picture and how it all fits together so I spend a lot of time just trying to get a picture of it in my mind.

That’s where I’m at on the creation thing.  Whenever we start to look into the latest ideas about “How to create” or “The law of attraction” we find that at some point someone will fall back on “It’s God”.   This seems to ma a bailout for “I don’t know”.  They’ll say, well, we don’t know exactly what it is but it’s the creative force in the universe and we can hook up with it to co-create and we call it God or God force or – Hey!!! Enough!  why not just call it Dark Matter and admit – You don’t know anything.  None of these people know what their doing.  They know that their is a law – that responds to thought (vibration).  OK, so we know that vibration has something to do with it.  We are pretty sure that this missing element in “the void” is involved.  We can see that different vibrational energies manifest in different form and that manifested form lends something, in the way of discovery,  when observed.  We are sort of able to connect conditions to intent or expectations.  So we kind of know that much – and we can attach a cause factor to it.  Now what?

As to the raising vibrational energies while understandable it all seems a little – hard.  Maybe it’s my current vibrational state that makes it seem hard.  Maybe it’s that I live in a monetary system where I need to bust my ass to eat and maintain a viable temperature.  That’s probably got a lot to do with it.  But maybe it’s because there’s so much mystery involved in the concept that it seem insurmountable.  My goal today is to introduce what might be the missing piece of the puzzle. The “Stuff of Creation” might be Plasma.

Written By The Soupdragon at

www.plasmacosmology.net

The history of science, of course, is fraught with controversy, and it is important to bear in mind that the situation today is little different. “A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it.” Max Planck

What is Plasma?

Plasma is the fourth state of matter. It differs from solids, liquids and gases in so far
as it’s atoms are divided into free-floating ‘negative’ electrons and ‘positive’ ions (an atom which has lost its electron/s). It is sometimes referred to as an ionized gas.

Students are generally taught about only three states of matter, and when Plasma does get a mention, little importance is assigned. Not only should plasma be added to the list, but the order should be reversed to put it in first place. The reasons for this will become clear.

The term Plasma was borrowed from blood plasma in order to describe its almost life-like and self-organising properties.

Plasma sometimes emits light when under the excitation of electrical and magnetic fields. Polar auroras bear witness to this fact.

Where is it?

Electric Cosmos.org – Planets
Plasma is almost everywhere. At least ninety-nine percent of the known universe is, in
fact, matter in its plasma state! The surface of the sun is plasma; not hot gas, which is quite a different thing.

Plasma in space consists entirely of ions and electrons, and is thus very energetic or ‘hot’.
Only when cooled does it form the matter to which we are familiar here on Earth: solids, liquids, and gases.

Because plasma remains electrically charged in space, it is influenced more by electromagnetic forces than gravity. In fact space, once considered mostly empty, has been found to be alive with plasma. Vast flows of charged particles have been discovered spanning hundreds-of-thousands of light years across interstellar space.

The most familiar examples of electrical plasmas here on earth are neon signs and lighting, television screens, and electrical arc welding machines. Fire and Lightning are also forms of Plasma.

Some behaviors and properties of Plasma

Plasma is an excellent conductor of electricity. Because of its free-flowing electrons its conductive properties far surpass those of copper and gold.

Due to its interaction with electromagnetism, plasmas display a complexity in structure far exceeding that of matter in gaseous, liquid, or solid states. It has a tendency to form into cellular and filamentary structures.

These structures derive from the fact that a charged particle flow (or current) produces a ring of magnetic fields around itself, ‘pinching’ plasma into multi-filamentary strands, as can be seen on both cosmic and more localized scales. Pictured right is a novelty plasma-lamp typical of those available on the high street.

Mainstream misconceptions

While conventional astronomy maps magnetism, electric currents are excluded on the mistaken basis that they are of no significance in space. Working from the inertia of this prior belief, astrophysicists have a tendency to talk in euphemisms. ‘Electron rains’ and ‘clouds of ionized gas’ are just two examples. From a conservative perspective these terms might seem easier to grasp than the behavior of more ethereal plasma, but they are, nonetheless, obfuscations. In reality we are talking about electrodynamic phenomena.

Plasma would serve really well as the creative material.  If we are to paint pictures with our minds we should be offered a material to use.  I offer this plasma not for speculation but for experimentation.  For those of us who have been frustrated with the whole – universe and creative energy  idea – this may pave the way to a more readily conceivable creative path.  If – like me you’ve been dissatisfied with the current “Mystery Model” this might give us a more hands on approach in our quest.

The Butterfly

Maybe you were wondering why I included “The Butterfly Effect” in the title.  It might be possible to shed some light on this effect with the use of plasma as the medium of all things.  A disturbance in the earths atmosphere isn’t likely to extend passed the dissipation of the wave.  In other words I can’t blow out a candle from across the room so how could the flap of a thistle down wing and so on.

The butterfly effect is a phrase that encapsulates the more technical notion of sensitive dependence on initial conditions in chaos theory. Small variations of the initial condition of a dynamical system may produce large variations in the long term behavior of the system. This is sometimes presented as esoteric behavior, but can be exhibited by very simple systems: for example, a ball placed at the crest of a hill might roll into any of several valleys depending on slight differences in initial position. Quantum chaos is the study of the butterfly effect in semiclassical physics and quantum mechanics.

It is a common subject in fiction when presenting scenarios involving time travel and with “what if” scenarios where one storyline diverges at the moment of a seemingly minor event resulting in two significantly different outcomes.

But what about Plasma?  If Plasma is the stuff of life then we won’t be looking at it like an atmosphere, or air or anything like that.  If it is the unformed that is formed through intent then we only have to be concerned with what qualifies as intent.  Does the physical effect the ethereal?  Would this be why all tribal cultures have dance and song?  Is this why we love music?  Why sound can move us to the emotional state of tears.  Why our physical acts create the conditions for memory and remembering can alter our present physical state?

At least now I have something to work with.  I can play around with intention and direct it – at  something.  I can imagine  it (for now) as real.  The thing about expectations is there has to be some notion of reality involved.  Here’s the deal, first “Life doesn’t give us what we deserve, It gives us what we expect”.  I just noticed as I wrote that, I finally had a substance, a structure, to attach to my idea of life.  As far as the statement goes, while true,  it’s a little vague.  Also it doesn’t offer a solution passed the stated conditional cause.  Conditional cause being – if you want something you need to expect something.  What it leaves out is, how do I get to this  workable state of expectation.

What I’ve been teaching is – first we “get real”.  We can’t manifest – I’m going to be King of the Moon – if we think it unlikely.  We may want it – but we don’t expect it to happen.  The expectation quotient may be increased as the result of the Plasma theory.  Lets say, if I’m the artist, and intention is my brush, then plasma is my paint, the Universe my canvas.  That works well for me.  I never had a good concept of the paint.  So now when my thoughts move like the butterfly I expect an everlasting effect.  I can see it happening.  In fact I can’t see it not happening.  Well, have fun – report results.