Serial Killers

What Does It Take To Be A Good Serial Killer?

I was on some site the other day reading the comments that followed a really good and informative video. The video was on the 9/11 cover up. The response was that there wasn't a cover up. That the event was as the government said it was. The commenter couldn't accept the videos premise that the buildings were demolished and it was all staged to gain a deeper control over, and eventually dissolve, the republic that we call the United States. The main reason the commenter could not accept what was laid out was he couldn't fathom why any one would do such a thing. He asked, why. Why would anyone want to do it? Therefore, it wasn't done. I guess he could understand that someone would want to discredit the government and that's why they made the movie. One could apply the same reasoning here and ask, why. Why would anyone want to discredit the government? It is important that these questions be answered. So that's what I plan to do.

For a long time I was of the same mind as the commenter. People would be talking about how the government did this or planned that. They would talk about the CIA bringing drugs into the country. They would talk about secret experiments done on the public and secret societies and secret governments and groups of people looking to take over the world and I didn't really believe them. They said I was terribly naive and told me to wake up. This was in the early 70's or late 60's. I just couldn't understand why anyone would want to do it. It made no sense. As it turned out I was terribly naive and needed to wake up. It took from then, as a teen, till now, in my fifties, for me to finally figure it out. Last night, another piece of the human element puzzle dropped in to place.

The mistake I was making was I thought that the behavioral mind-set necessary to organize and execute some horrific plan of world domination was limited to the occasional genetic abnormality. We don't doubt stories and films about Hitler, Stalin, Mao or Pol pot. We say, these people are evil. We believe it happened. We believe that there have been awful people and they have done awful things. We also, and of course I refer to a majority here, believe that "we" the U.S. has led the fight against this type of phenomena. That's another idea that we hold. That it's a rare phenomena. We look at these historical figures like mad serial killers. That they are few and far between. Are they?

I have all but eliminated, for myself, the existence of a human nature. It is a commonly used phrase and has been studied for a long time and there are a lot of opinions out there. I have found only a few traits common to all humans. These few traits are all that can be classified as human nature. Everything else is an environmental effect. If you've read my writings you'll know that I consider the "desire to be happy" an aspect of human nature. In fact this is all I can be sure of. Once again it becomes the key to understanding the phenomena of maniacal conspiracy. It helps in understanding why and how they come to exist. How they manage to get from the idea stage to the execution stage. And lastly, why "we are able" to doubt there existence. This last is explained very simply: we doubt it because it interferes with our happiness. If faced with a choice between evidence that creates unhappiness and happiness most people choose happiness. There is enough solid evidence out there to completely destroy all the fantasies that exist about humans and the world we live in. Do people believe in the fantasies? Absolutely. There can be only one reason for this. They like the fantasy. No person "knowingly" holds on to a fantasy that causes them to be unhappy.

Lets look for the phenomena in our midst. Lets see if we can find the mind of the serial killer at the top of our society. In the current "elected" leaders of the nation. How would we know if we had serial killers holding high positions? What would be the criteria, the evidence? We would need to see the victims. Are there victims? The government of the U.S. just killed a million people in Iraq. A large portion of our society sees this statistic and thinks, "That's just terrible. Why do they have to do this?". But incredibly, the they, is not our government. It's not the U.N.. The they, is the old government of Iraq. The they are terrorists. The they, are extremists, Islamic fundamentalist, barbarians etc. But why? None of those "theys" killed those people. We did. That is a fact. If you wanted to kill a snake, how would you go about it? Say the snake was truly dangerous. Would go at it with a toothpick and start poking holes in it's body hoping that you finished the job before it bit you? Of course not. You'd get a machete and lop it's head off. What were the Killers after in Iraq? Not the snake. Anyone could have killed the snake. There was a story that there were several attempts to take out Saddam. I'm not even going to try and find a way to believe that.

So what is really going on in the world? Do we have crazy people who have formed secret societies and are bent on world domination and don't consider your life or the lives of a billion people significant? This is the why part that keeps people from being able to accept the overwhelming amount of evidence. If we can understand and accept that the mental aberration we saw in the Hitlers and Stalin's is identical to the serial killers in our government today we can start to get a realistic picture of the world. The world, as it is, not as we "want" it to be. We need to draw this comparison because "That's what they are". Crazed maniacal killers. They are not rare, they are not - over there. They are standing in front of you, talking and smiling. Why would people find this hard to believe? Do they want serial killers to look crazy?

Is it better to have a sociopathic killer or a psychopathic killer? Which is more dangerous, a psychopath or a sociopath? The difference between the two is a sociopath doesn't see people as people - for him they are more in the thing category. Psychopaths see people as people. That's why they get so mad at them. For now I would like to unplug us from the descriptive and just look at effect. Result. If we concentrate on results what do we see? Do we see a lot of death? Is death by starvation or civil war different from court ordered execution? It surely isn't if you're the one taking your last breath in the hot sand or choking at the end of a rope. Do we see it as different? From out here? From the sofa?

The whole psychological picture is to much to cover in this article but I want to make this point as to how a conspiracy of great magnitude is possible. It is our acceptance of things, without evidence, that makes the whole world domination idea possible. Lets say that there is a group of people who want to destroy the world as we know it. How could such a group of people succeed? Who would help them? This is the other big deal from the "that could never happen" position. This camp of conspiracy scoffers state that it's not there because it can't be there. They are convinced that there need be a great number of people, at least hundreds of thousands, to aid and abet the group in order for it to succeed. I couldn't agree more. How many people do you suppose are in this camp? I would say, it's most of the people on the planet. That's more than enough to aid and abet. It's not necessary for everyone to grab a grenade or torture a prisoner. I was a resident of this camp of scoffers. It's a perfectly reasonable position to adopt. Most sane people adopt this position. It's hard for sane people to imagine that there are a large number of insane people loose on the streets. Or more to the point, it's really hard to imagine your congressman is a serial killer. Not an alcoholic, or a greedy thieving self serving pervert, but a cold eyed killer. Hard to believe? One million dead Iraqis. This is the evidence. One million people. Dead. What serial killer can compete with that?

So now we have a great deal of support for the killers. Don't we? Most people don't interfere with them because they refuse to accept they exist. This is absolutely essential if the crazed killers are going to succeed. Another camp has "reasoned" that the million dead are not dead because we killed them. It's not really our fault. Sounds really stupid but that's what happens. We can't have been responsible for their deaths. Why? It makes us unhappy to see it that way. So we don't see it. We reason they are dead because of "the axis of evil". If it weren't for the "evil" people in this world. Those evil people out there. Over there. Those people. The dead would not be dead. There: now we can be happy. We can get on with our lives. These two camps are the main ingredients for the success of the secret society of mass murderers. We need to stop thinking of them as globalists or elitists. We need to think of them as they are, for what they are: stone cold killers.

There are two other groups that are necessary and they are just as plentiful. The first is the apostles. These form the outer circle. Again the killers rely on human nature. That one proven aspect of human nature: the desire to be happy. You have a large group, not comparatively large when held up against the first two but plentiful enough, of people who are enamored with power. They long to be around the powerful. They are the same as those who populate the crowds where movie stars and celebrities appear. The top ten search queries for the last two years has been almost exclusively celebrity related. I think that in 2008 Obama replaced Brittany Spears. It was some young starlet. These are the people who need to be close to, what they see as success. To them, success and happiness are synonymous. It, this idea, has become "them". This is the first line of defense employed by the killers. They are the major news networks. They are congressman, police, the military, the self proclaimed elite, authors, educators, scientists. They don't all share the same psychological profile as "The Group". They're not the all crazy killers. I wouldn't suggest that this is the case. Lot's of them come from the "I don't see it" camp. Lot's of them especially in the police and military are there because they can't do anything else. They just wind up there. They want power, don't have the ability to gain power for themselves, so they gravitate to any position that gives them power. These are often some of the most dangerous people on the planet. These are the ones that blindly obey. But always it is within this layer, this strata, you find a host of individuals who "need" to be there. They need to be close to the seats of power, control and authority. This is the same as the desire to be on the winning team. You never see the losing team celebrating. There is no rejoicing and revelry. No joyful faces yelling, "We lost, we lost...".

These people who relate success with happiness have accepted, for the most part, that they are not going to be the king. That's reasonable, since there is only room for one king per kingdom. So what are they left with? There aren't a lot of princes either and once you've been born not a prince that's out. If you think it would be the best thing ever to be the king, or the celebrity, or the governor, but realize it's not to be, what then? Well how about, "...if I can be close to the king I'll be happier". If I can be a teachers assistant I'll be more powerful than the regular students. Once again, not all teachers aids or congressional aids, are little wanna be Hitlers. But lets look at the evidence. We recall the scenes from Abu Ghriab? These were not powerful people. These were not people that would ever become Stalins or Saddams. But it's not because they weren't evil enough - they aren't smart enough. The experiment with the college kids where they were assigned roles as guards or inmates in the prison setting turned out the same way. I don't know what would have happened if the students were aware of the purpose of the experiment. If they were told, "We're going to see if we can turn you into little monsters", I doubt if the results would have been the same. But we can clearly see the potential for people to be sadistic. The films aren't shown anymore but this is happening every hour of every day all over the world. The U.S. is still doing it right now. Nothing has changed with the new figure heads of state.

Again I want to say that not all the people that are in these circles, these proximity's, are there for the purpose of doing harm. They are for the most part there with the "intention" of doing good. Most of them think that the system is good. But it is their needs that keep them from seeing clearly. To see the focus of their fixation as evil interferes with their happiness. So, they shut off seeing. So where are they? They make up a large part of all those who, lawfully, carry guns. They make up, a majority, of those who gather around political power centers. This includes the network media and the bureaucracies of the nation. They are the IRS, DOJ, FDA, UN, EU, CIA, FBI, NSA and all organizations of this type. They are all associated and involved in and with the state. These are the ones that define good and bad for the masses. They are the propaganda machines. They tell us what is acceptable and what isn't. Right now they are screaming at the top of their lungs, "We need to take control of everything. It is for your own protection. You will be happy when we do this. We will protect you. Do - Not - Interfere...".

Now in this taking absolute control, the "that can't be true" camp, won't be much of a problem. They will go where they're told - just until we straighten this mess out. This is the camp that could ruin everything for the killers. We'll have to wait and see what happens. The rest of the nation, and the world, knowingly or not has taken up their positions. Everything is in place. But you may, depending on what camp you're in, still be wondering what I'm talking about. You may not see, in spite of the evidence, what's going on. You say, "I still don't get it, what's the plan, who are the killers? Where are they?". Remember the million dead people? If I took a blow torch to someone in your living room would you remember? Would you say, "You're a maniac. You're insane..."? Of course you would. Who killed the million people? Lets ask the really pertinent question. How did someone manage to kill a million people, put it on TV, and walk away like nothing happened. Like it was no big deal? Oh no, worse than that - like it was necessary. The message is - it was good. How do the killers kill us? They organize us, teach us, to volunteer. Don't think people will put there heads on the block voluntarily? Let's look at Iraq again. A little while ago, before we simply shot them dead, we used to starve them. Remember the program that devastated the country of Iraq? They interviewed the secretary of state and asked if starving the women and children in Iraq was OK. She said - Yes - we think so. On TV. Said it on TV to the nation. She's free. She's not in jail or locked up in an asylum. She's financially secure, respected by her peers, admired by a thankful nation. The evidence says, she is a cold hearted killer. This is the inner circle. When we don't rise up against these people we volunteer for whatever comes next.

The inner circle today in the U.S. are the president and his administration. They are not "The Group" they are the executioners. People wept tears when he was elected. Even though he wasn't really elected. What I mean by that is he wasn't chosen to run by the people of the U.S. We "the people" don't have that opportunity. We get to vote, once the outcome is acceptable. So we are able now to set and watch the plan "the conspiracy" unfold. Most will watch it and do nothing. In doing nothing we volunteer our lives. We will watch the executioners execute the plan. I say we will, in fact we are. We are watching the executioners kill women and children. Some of us think it's necessary. Not because we are bad people. It's because we are human. We have that desire to be happy and it blocks out the reality of the event. In order for us to survive the plan we must be willing to be unhappy. We must be willing to go through great pain - right now. The pain of the evidence. The pain of the picture in front of our eyes. If you look at the picture it's going to hurt like hell. If you refuse it's going to kill you. Everything and everybody you love will die. Because the killers want you dead.

Until we want the truth above all else we will not see. Until we say, it's OK to be wrong. Unless thoroughly understand our primary desire for "happiness" we will be at risk of living our entire lives in a fantasy. That there is "not" a group of people with a plan to destroy the world, as we know it, is a fantasy. If we believe "we will be happy if" we are living in a fantasy. Doesn't matter what if is. I will be happy "when" must go too. That is a fantasy. Now this doesn't mean that the desire to be happy is bad, or wrong. The fantasy is taught to us by people who truly have an understanding of human nature. The people that have the plan really understand you. They know what you want and why you want it. We have to learn to say, I don't know, and be OK with it. "I know" is a big deal in the plan. "I know" is the winning team. It is the popularity contest. "I'm right" will kill us. What is going to save us is absolute realism. This is going to involve great unhappiness. Or at least great psychological unhappiness. We're going to have to give up, temporarily, a lot of what we are dependent on. The first thing we have to give up on is money. Not value, which is completely subjective, but paper dollars. Why? Two reasons. One - it's not real, never was. Two - this is the "Group". When you look at a federal reserve note you're looking at, as close as you will probably come to, the group.

All the executioners exist because of money. Take away money today and you would have a government of people tomorrow. You say perhaps, "we can't live with out money". You don't know that. There is no evidence to support that opinion. People live on the earth today - with out money. You say, "I don't want to live in the rain forest, I want to live like I do now. With a TV and a car and hot soapy water...". Great, so do I. What evidence does anyone have that we have to have money to do that? There is not one single shred of evidence that supports that idea. So how did the idea get in our heads? It was taught to us. Why was it taught? Who decides what gets taught? Here is a real easy way to look at the big plan picture. It's like a pyramid. At the top of the pyramid is - The Group. We don't need to know much about the group members, although they are known and it's not hard to find out. We just need to conceive the system realistically. So at the top of the pyramid is the group and the tool - the only tool - of the group is money.

Everything underneath this that operates on the "Groups" money is controlled, managed or influenced by the group. The closer to the top, the more money and the more controlled. Farther down the scale there is less money and less direct control. The important thing about the money that is used is it's not really money. You cannot earn it directly. It is only borrowed at interest. Directly below the group is the nation state. Only states are allowed to borrow money. All money that is used by a nation is borrowed. The longer a nation operates under the Groups money system the deeper in debt they go and there is no end. There is no way to repay the debt with money. This is because it has no real value. It's just paper. It's an agreement. Nothing more. The debt can only be paid with "real property". That "real property" is everything that exists in the real world. What might that be? What do you see when you look around? That's it. All of it. Everything you see.

Somewhere down the pyramid the system takes on a purposeful objective that is a big part, another necessary ingredient, of the plan. This is the promotion of ignorance. This is where the curtain is. Behind the curtain is the group. This leads us back to the "Who taught us" question. This is where the teachers are. Keep in mind that your second grade teacher is not a knowing participant in a conspiracy to kill the world. That level is connected to the upper level by organizations like the Dept. of Education and closer still are people like Aldous Huxley. The Huxley types are close enough to know what the group is doing, they promote the agenda. He is allowed to know because he agrees with the plan. I don't know who will survive the plan. I don't know what position people like Aldous Huxley will hold, if any. For sure, neither does Aldous Huxley. He and others of his ilk just enjoy the positions they are given at present. I would say that people like Cecil Rhodes would have been able to be a part of the "surviving master group". So what do we have to thank Cecil for? How about the Rhodes Scholar program? Special grooming programs for the future leaders? Where does the CIA recruit people from? Schools. The farther down the pyramid you are, the less likely you are to know what's really going on. The system relies on peoples need to be part of, or associated with, the winning team. Promoting ignorance and fantasy is crucial to the success of the plan.

So everything we learn from the system is propagandized. It's colored to maintain the ignorance of the masses. It says, you are entitled to the pursuit of happiness. Then defines happiness - every day, all day long. It says, work hard, it will pay off in the long run. Good things come to those who wait. Let me ask you, what's the pay off? What are the good things that come to those who wait. Am I receiving a real good experience from going to work everyday or am I just getting pleasure from doing, what I've been told, is the "right" thing to do? The "responsible" thing. Is there any evidence that a capitalist system is good? See the pyramid? Where does the good transition into misery, starvation and continuous war? Well, "Money is OK, capitalism isn't a bad system. It's just the greedy few who ruin it for everyone else...". In the ongoing financial meltdown, or what we are told is a meltdown, who is suffering? Where on the pyramid does the suffering start? Is the group messing up? Is there goal to control the world through their imaginary money failing? Absolutely not. Just the opposite. This is the plan. It's unfolding before your eyes. All we have to do, to see exactly what the group is doing, is open our eyes and look.

The bottom line is this. The only way the plan can continue is if we allow the federal reserve to remain in place. You and me, you who read this, can't oust the group. The majority of the people in, second or third tier, positions of power don't really know what's happening. Most of them are collectivists with ideas of Utopia. I believe a Utopia is possible, I just see to much evidence that it doesn't lie in collectivism. Or any other ism. There is still a great deal of real power available to us. If you live in the places that will still allow you to raise a ruckus. If dissent can still be exercised, that is a position of power. First we who understand what is happening have to make others aware. We have to convince every person possible. When this is done then the scales will balance. It is now a matter of numbers. When it comes to accomplishing this you know as much as me - hopefully more. I am doing what you see before you. I don't know what else to do. There are a lot of groups that you can join. There is a lot of evidence you can get and show people. It's really not the people working for the group that are the problem. It's the masses. I guess the masses need to stop being the masses. Finally I want to say one more thing about the, "Why would someone want to do that", argument.

This was even hard for me to conceive. Long after I had accepted the evidence. Looked right into the face of the group. I still couldn't explain to myself or anyone else "why anyone would want to do it". The mistake is in thinking about them, the group and their acolytes, as people. That's what we're really confused about. We are really wondering why "people" would act like that. We wonder the same thing when somebodies neighbor kills the wife and kids, or gets arrested and they find seven bodies in the freezer. We have to stop thinking of them as people. Or at least people like us. We also need to get over the idea that these executioners should look and act - like executioners. What is commonly said about the people arrested for killing a family or loading up the freezer with bodies. "They seemed so nice. I would have never thought it of them". Who are these serial killers who work for the group? Who just killed a million people in Iraq? Who gave the orders? Who pulled the trigger, dropped the bombs? Who are the guards and the interrogators in the rendition camps? Who hunts the populace for traitors? Who installed the cameras and listening devices? Who pulls you out of line at the airport? Who writes laws like the patriot act? They are all killers. Stop looking at them like they are people. Stop looking at the president as a person. People, don't get to be president anymore. I can't say exactly how long it's been this way but it's been a good long while. There are a scattering of people in the government. Most are just killers. This seems a little harsh. I know. But it's necessary. They have chosen sides. If you join the killers, that's what you are. It's necessary to snap out of what we've been thinking. To jar ourselves awake.

How were all these people turned into killers? Money. Remember the Group uses money. Money and power and a natural desire to be happy. This is the basic outline. If this was the only outline available it would be enough to act on. For any individual it's only necessary to understand the groups plan and to recognize those involved. But this is not all the material available. This is a little bit of information. There is a ton of information and a lot of people who are working to put an end to "The groups" reign of terror.