"New World Order: Minions and Masters"

Who do they think they are?

The most popular topic in my head is The New World Order. I find it thoroughly fascinating. I understand the Masters and I've come to understand the Minions. The acolytes. The masters have a constant underlying vibrational quality. It's the vibration of power. A lot of work and study has been done on the harmonic properties of life. Everything in life has a unique harmonic resonance. It's similar to what you look for if you study your bio-rhythms. I'm no expert, I just have a intuitive since that our individual "natures" has a unique vibration. Ever meet someone that you couldn't stand to be close to? I think that's what it is. You and they, are discordant. Your frequencies aren't melding to make a harmony, They're at odds and it makes a screech. OK, I get sidetracked easy. So all these tyrant types have this quality in their natures. They gravitate towards power. Having it. Wielding it. Control, domination and authority is their idea of happiness. Their view of the global population is: It is not healthy. Freud's analysis: that we have tendencies for violence that if left unchecked will bring us to extinction is fully excepted by the inner circle of the New World Order. In this assessment - I agree. Where we differ is in the solution. I get a kick out of these people like Bill O'Reilly and some others on the extremely long list of venomists and war party liners. I can't help but wonder who they think they are. In this grand scheme to bring a totalitarian one world corporate regime in control of the planet, where do they think they'll end up? I don't think the depopulation plans discussed by the United Nations, the Rockefellers and Club of Romer's of this world exclude small people like Tony Snow and Rudy Giuliani. Bill Crystal doesn't stand a chance. Some of the military will have to live to serve as the hand of the new law. But lets face it these folks are all about blood lines and visions of divinity. Really guys, if you want to survive the end game you better wake up. In the survival mentality it's every man for himself. Who are the top players on the planet? Trust me, it's not those who pass out the literature. No matter how important you think your job is, it will soon be an archaic art.

The costumed clowns actually think of themselves as intellectuals. When you put them beside anyone of high intellect, say Noam Chomsky, they all get red and frothy. Pouty, surly little brains scrambling to remember something of worth to combat the unexpected dose of realism washing across their script dulled brains. In the world of common sense and true understanding they don't fare well. They can't keep up. They are like spoiled children who rely on the wealthy parent and are used to being accepted by a class they didn't create and don't really participate in. Their only value is as a temporary mouth piece. Cut them out of their packs and they are unable to mount a sane and logical argument. So where do they come from, these servants and acolytes of the would be kings? Well I understand what draws them. I went through a brief period of wanting to hang with people I considered cool. I made an attempt to get to know them. What I found was that the price was to high. I would have had to sacrifice myself, my convictions and identity. I would have had to become someone else. I understand the draw, the lure of prestige through association. I also see the danger in the loss of individual essence. What takes place when people are obsessed with positions, somewhere in the vicinity of power, is the followers lose their minds. They lose their ability to reason and make decisions based on personal ethics. They adopt the values of their masters. This is the difference between ethics and morals. Ethics are derived of the individual. Morals are merely dictates.

The other side effect of turning your life and mind over to a status is that you lose your humanity. You lose that connection with the rest of mankind on a personal level. You adopt the mindset of the master and the individual becomes an opponent. People lose their significance. This callousness is present in everyone who knows that children starve and suffer but choose to remain adherent to it's cause. The apostle of the new world order knows that some people must die to make the world better. There are a lot of people who are simply not worthy of continuing. They are not the chosen ones. In order to be a follower you have to feel as though you are one of the chosen ones. True human involvement is not good. It's, "My people", "My nation", "My god", "Our plans...". Any plan, any idea, that sacrifices the individual...is crap. I know there are loftier terms I could have used, but the time for saying it good is gone. It's shit. Stinking, evil, no saving grace, blatantly stupid, off the scale...trash. No intellectual would listen to the ideas of the elitist new worlders for more than a minute or two before dismissing them as the ravings of lower life forms. The difference would be that the thinking man would understand that something went awry in there schooling and seek to offer a sane perspective. I have never bothered to try and see peoples intelligence as equal. Why would I? Intelligence isn't a measuring stick for humanity. People are equal because they are people. There are stupid people, smart people, clever people and every kind of people you can find, point out and think of. All people. All worthy of every opportunity for self improvement. Some people need to be restrained. You can't retrieve everybody who has been twisted in knots by the environment. Lot's of people today are products of a toxic environment. They may or may not ever think straight. They are still people and need be treated humanly.

A third of the planet exists in the form of the new world order. It's no longer something that the criminal elitist is thinking up. They have arranged the European Union. They have some global currency. They have the Codex Alimentarius. They are in the process of contaminating the food supply. They have managed to poison the earth. It is all taking shape. They are taking absolute control over everything needed to stay alive and free. They will not stop. They cannot be reasoned with. They are a breed unto themselves. I'd explain that statement in more detail but I don't know the details. I do know that they think differently than 90% of the people on earth. The way they have gotten control is by using the weakness that exists in a large percentage of the earths population. I can explain what I mean by a weakness. It recently came to my attention that most kids today want to be stars. They want to be famous. They want to be like the people they see on TV and in the movies. Not the characters, the actors. A lot of the people you see on the news, in the government, in positions of power or close to the power were this type of kid. In fact they are still kids. They have never stopped to fully examine their surroundings. When you let kids out of the car at the park they don't see anything but the swings and the merry-go-round. They don't slow down until they get there. No thought of the landscape, how the swings got there, the meaning of life, or fun, or kidhood. It's just - I want. If the "I want" wants fame, all other rational thoughts are suppressed. Very few, a minute proportion, will attain stardom. There isn't that much room at the top. What's going to happen? If they remain obsessed they'll get as close as they can to the star. They'll cling to the people that have what they crave. It's no different than wanting to be with the popular kids in school.

It's this simple child psychology that the would be master race uses to gain control. The truly scary aspect of this psychological glitch is that we end up with an abnormally large amount of wanna-be power seekers with guns, badges and law degrees. The worst scenario is they wind up sitting on a judges bench with the power to interpret the constitution. So I guess this is all fairly depressing and I'm not immune to getting a dose of it myself. Up until the last five or six years I figured we may be able to survive as a species if someone had the means to lock up, run off or just plain kill all the powerful criminal crazies and a good portion of their minions. I have to keep a tight leash on that part of my thinking because it makes me kind of miserable. Today I have managed to get my rage under control and spend a lot of time looking for people with good information and good ideas for a reasonable world. One of the greatest websites I've run across lately is the Venus Project. Erwin Laszlo and the 'World shift' plan is great and there are a lot of people working toward a more sane sustainable system. Not surprising most of the "new life" systems have done away with money. I truly believe and the evidence is there that money will have to become part of our past. It served a purpose as we started having more than we could use ourselves and it was OK but it's definitely run it's course and then some. It is the thing that the new world crap eaters must have. With out it, there whole plan lacks the means to the end.

It seems that the evolutionary stages are met in ways that force us to evolve to meet them. It's like the herds of grass eaters. Life changed, earth changed and there was a lot of grass. If you learned to eat grass you did OK. If you learned to hunt the grass eaters you did OK. I suppose that the new shape of the next life evolution will be a sort of humanity based world. A world of ethical considerations. Of the all as individuals. Nation, religions, ethnicity based systems will not work. They served a purpose as the world around us evolved and it's time to move on. You can see the old systems crumbling around us. Global economics is in ruins. It will, if aloud to continue, struggle to adjust the earths population to fit it's mold. We, as a race, have outgrown it. Life has evolved passed it. If we try to hang on to it it will drag us along to it's death. There is no reason this has to happen. Will some get dragged to their death? Undoubtedly. It is always this way. Most of us will choose humanity and the new life. When money is let go of the new world order will end. It will die. If we don't let go the world will turn into a nightmare. Here is the sad part of the money thing. To the new world terror kings money is not of value. Do you think there will be a monetary system in the depopulated world? What would be the point? See it's only a tool. It only serves one master. We need to choose what is important. We all need to look very closely. Not just see the swings and take off in a mad dash.

So you now have an answer to the only problem we are faced with today. Don't get distracted by the minions. There job is to get your mind headed off towards the merry-go-round. There are many people working hard to get us up to speed. They aren't usually the flashy famous type but we need to grow out of that.

History of Terrorism

Terrorist acts or the threat of such action have been in existence for millennia. Despite having a history longer than the modern nation-state, the use of terror by governments and those that contest their power remains poorly understood. While the meaning of the word terror itself is clear, when it is applied to acts and actors in the real world it becomes confused. Part of this is due to the use of terror tactics by actors at all levels in the social and political environment. Is the Unabomber, with his solo campaign of terror, a criminal, terrorist, or revolutionary?

Can he be compared to the French revolutionary governments who coined the word terrorism by instituting systematic state terror against the population of France in the 1790s, killing thousands? Are either the same as revolutionary terrorist groups such as the Baader-Mienhof Gang of West Germany or the Weather Underground in the United States?

So we see that distinctions of size and political legitimacy of the actors using terror raise questions as to what is and is not terrorism. The concept of moral equivalency is frequently used as an argument to broaden and blur the definition of terrorism as well. This concept argues that the outcome of an action is what matters, not the intent. Collateral or unintended damage to civilians from an attack by uniformed military forces on a legitimate military target is the same as a terrorist bomb directed deliberately at the civilian target with the intent of creating that damage.

Simply put, a car bomb on a city street and a jet fighter dropping a bomb on a tank are both acts of violence that produce death and terror. Therefore (at the extreme end of this argument) any military action is simply terrorism by a different name. This is the reasoning behind the famous phrase "One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter". It is also a legacy of legitimizing the use of terror by successful revolutionary movements after the fact.

The very flexibility and adaptability of terror throughout the years has contributed to the confusion. Those seeking to disrupt, reorder or destroy the status quo have continuously sought new and creative ways to achieve their goals. Changes in the tactics and techniques of terrorists have been significant, but even more significant are the growth in the number of causes and social contexts where terrorism is used.

Over the past 20 years, terrorists have committed extremely violent acts for alleged political or religious reasons. Political ideology ranges from the far left to the far right. For example, the far left can consist of groups such as Marxists and Leninists who propose a revolution of workers led by a revolutionary elite. On the far right, we find dictatorships that typically believe in a merging of state and business leadership.

Nationalism is the devotion to the interests or culture of a group of people or a nation. Typically, nationalists share a common ethnic background and wish to establish or regain a homeland.

Religious extremists often reject the authority of secular governments and view legal systems that are not based on their religious beliefs as illegitimate. They often view modernization efforts as corrupting influences on traditional culture.

Special interest groups include people on the radical fringe of many legitimate causes; e.g., people who use terrorism to uphold antiabortion views, animal rights, radical environmentalism. These groups believe that violence is morally justifiable to achieve their goals.

Voices Of The New World Order

by Jim Marrs from his book, Rule by Secrecy:

"The concept of the Trilateral Commission was originally brought to (David) Rockefeller by Zbigniew Brzezinski, then head of the Russian Studies Department at Columbia University. While at the Brookings Institution, Brzezinski had been researching the need for closer cooperation between the trilateral nations of Europe, North America, and Asia.

...With the blessing of the Bilderbergers and the CFR, the Trilateral Commission began organizing on July 23-24, 1972, at the 3,500-acre Rockefeller estate at Pocantico Hills. New York.

...The Trilateral Commission officially was founded on July 1, 1973, with David Rockefeller as chairman. Brzezinski was named founding North American director."
- (pp. 22-24)

Any dictator would admire the uniformity and obedience of the U.S. media.
Noam Chomsky

If the Nuremberg laws were applied, then every post-war American president would have been hanged.
Noam Chomsky

"The Trilateralist Commission is international...(and)...is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the United States. The Trilateralist Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power - political, monetary, intellectual, and ecclesiastical."
Barry Goldwater

"Mr. President, a careful examination of what is happening behind the scenes reveals that all of these interests are working in concert with the zeitgeist of the Kremlin in order to create what some refer to as a New World Order. Private organizations such as the Council on Foreign Relations, the Royal Institute of International Affairs, the Trilateral Commission, the Dartmouth Conference, the Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies, the Atlantic Institute, and the Bilderberger Group serve to disseminate and to coordinate the plans for this so-called New World Order in powerful business, financial, academic, and official circles..."
Senator Jesse Helm, before Senate, 12/15/87

"In the economic-technological field, some international cooperation has already been achieved, but further progress will require greater American sacrifices. More intensive efforts to shape a New World monetary structure will have to be undertaken, with some consequent risk to the present relatively favorable American position."
Zbigniew Brzezinski, CFR member and founding member of the Trilateral Commission, and National Security Adviser to five presidents